tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2752642124667077789.post2216676243338179366..comments2023-12-06T18:23:27.072+10:30Comments on That Guy From Delhi: Patch: Using --no-comments with pg_dumpRobins Tharakanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02748267202194708735noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2752642124667077789.post-25619804142086303712020-08-01T21:12:20.808+09:302020-08-01T21:12:20.808+09:30Top Black Friday Deals for 2020<a href="https://topblackfridaydealz.com/" rel="nofollow">Top Black Friday Deals </a> for 2020Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16974337532318174689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2752642124667077789.post-32694439914412458742017-06-01T00:24:32.319+09:302017-06-01T00:24:32.319+09:30I've written kludges of this type before. You...I've written kludges of this type before. You've now convinced me that the bug isn't in the pg_dump code, but in RDS Postgres and similar for causing pg_restore to fail by default. I'll see about getting these reported and acted on.David Fetterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06408194859600882631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2752642124667077789.post-11725848471443899732017-05-31T10:33:27.916+09:302017-05-31T10:33:27.916+09:30It's completely understandable for it to not b...It's completely understandable for it to not be included in PGv10, which is why I mentioned the point...<br /><br />Interesting to realize that 'popularity' isn't a metric for a back-patch. And so although this didn't occur to me earlier, when put this way, does make sense. Thanks for clarifying.Robins Tharakanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02748267202194708735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2752642124667077789.post-70905422671477375832017-05-31T09:40:49.528+09:302017-05-31T09:40:49.528+09:30The comments for Ref 3 and 4 are simple inline com...The comments for Ref 3 and 4 are simple inline commentary while the comments for Ref 1 and 2 are actual SQL entities. Mixing them together doesn't seem desirable nor necessary since inline comment should not actually cause problems if the client software is written correctly. All they do is bloat the dump but with compression I cannot see them being that big a deal.<br /><br />Also, given David J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11419598965315537172noreply@blogger.com